Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 B.R. 288 - In Re Mata

In Re Mata’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
November 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2014

3 federal appellate · 2 district ·

130199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 26 U.S.C. § 401 (Self-Employed Individuals Tax Retirement Act of 1962) · 26 U.S.C. § 408 (§ 2002 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 28 U.S.C. § 2403 · 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (§ 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Hanover National Bank v. Moyses · In Re Matteson · In Re Lennen · In Re Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “means compensation paid or payable for personal services, whether denominated as ... avails of any pension or retirement benefits, or a deferred compensation plan ... or otherwise. 5 .... 6 (1.1) For purposes of this section and only for the purpose of claiming an exemption in bankruptcy,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “property that is exempt under ... state or local law....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The State of Colorado may freely adopt exemption statutes which serve to exempt a judgment debtor’s assets from levy and execution by judgment creditors in this state. Those statutes will also allow debtors to exempt those same assets from the reach of the trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 522 (b)(2)(A). That is the scheme mandated and approved by Congress. However, the State of Colorado cannot, under the guise of adopting an exemption statute, adopt a federal bankruptcy exemption for Colorado residents who file bankruptcy. (Emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.