Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 Cal. App. 2d 525 - Raphael v. Raphael

115 Cal. App. 2d 525 - Raphael v. Raphael’s Empirical Analysis

1953

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably King v. Uhlmann (1968), 73 Cal. App. 4th 338 - Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of Equalization (1999)

36 state decisions

16019531960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Viner v. Untrecht · Stromerson v. Averill · Union Mutual Life Insurance v. Broderick · Raphael v. Raphael · 39 Cal. 2d 66 - Paterson v. Comastri

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... that all property then owned by them or subsequently acquired was to belong to them equally or, as respondent put it, "fifty-fifty.' " Similarly, in Estate of Raphael (1949), 91 Cal.App.2d 931, 936-937 [ 206 P.2d 391, 394 ], the husband's statement as related by his wife that "... everything he had was mine, and everything I had was his; that we were partners in everything, and everything was fifty-fifty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Since the referee was entitled to conclude that Raymond held only the naked legal title * * * as trustee for Harry there was no substantial property interest in Raymond which could become the community property of Raymond and Bertha under their transmutation agreement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.