115 Conn. App. 207 - State v. Chimenti’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2016
most recently cited
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · North Carolina v. Pearce · Green v. United States · State v. Golding · Yakus v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]here are two lines of cases involving principles of double jeopardy and the applicability and availability of Golding review. The first involves double jeopardy claims arising in the course of a single trial and allows for Golding review. See, e.g., State v. Brooks, 88 Conn.App. 204 , 214-17, 868 A.2d 778 , cert. denied, 273 Conn. 933 , 873 A.2d 1001 (2005) ; State v. Nixon, 32 Conn.App. 224 , 235, 630 A.2d 74 (1993), aff'd, 231 Conn. 545 , 651 A.2d 1264 (1995). The second line of cases involves double jeopardy claims arising out of the trial of a defendant who has a double jeopardy claim that arises from a prior proceeding and generally prevents a determination of an unpreserved claim on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.