115 Conn. App. 234 - Rossman v. Morasco’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
6 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Bozelko v. Papastavros (2016), 117 Conn. App. 680 - Perez v. D AND L TRACTOR TRAILER SCHOOL (2009)
6 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gurliacci v. Mayer · Appleton v. Board of Education · Dunham v. Dunham · Santopietro v. City of New Haven · Collum v. Chapin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The unjust enrichment claim is equitable in nature and, thus, the court need not adhere to definitive statutes of limitation. See Rossman v. Morasco, 115 Conn.App. 234 , 974 A.2d 1 , cert. denied, 293 Conn. 923 , 980 A.2d 912 (2009) (“Although courts in equitable proceedings often look by analogy to the statute of limitations to determine whether, in the interests of justice, a particular action should be heard, they are by no means obliged to adhere to those time limitations.”) (citations omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.