Young v. Upson’s Empirical Analysis
115 F. 192 · 1902
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1950
4 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. . Ingersoll · Clark Assignee v. Iselin · Booth v. . Kehoe · Heermans v. . Ellsworth · Stites v. Dunnahoo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“. “It is contended that it is essential to the validity of the transfer that notice should have been given to the debtors whose claims were assigned. This contention is unsound. The necessity for a notice by an assignee to the debtor arises where he seeks to protect himself against a payment by the debtor to the original creditor.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.