Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 F.1d 200 - In re Garner

In re Garner’s Empirical Analysis

115 F. 200 · 1902

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
April 2000
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2000

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2019021910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Moran v. King · In re Moran

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “admit[ ] [the writing] to record, to be recorded as deeds are recorded”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “shall be admitted to record, to be recorded as deeds are recorded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.