Baker v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
115 F. 297 · 1902
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently July 1936
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rogers v. Wm. Rogers Manuf'g Co. · William Rogers Manuf'g Co. v. R. W. Rogers Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The evidence upon the accounting failed to disclose that ■ complainant was entitled to any recovery of profits, or any except nominal damages, by reason of the defendant’s conduct. It failed to disclose that a single person had purchased goods marketed l>y the defendant supposing them to he the product of the complainant, or that the complainant, had lost a single customer hy defendant’s conduct.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.