Jones v. Cyphers’s Empirical Analysis
115 F. 324 · 1902
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently June 1926
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brown v. Piper · Grier v. Wilt · Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. Russell · New Departure Bell Co. v. Bevin Bros. Manuf'g Co. · Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Metropolitan Burglar Alarm Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) An incubator or brooder comprising a closed chamber having a fresh-air inlet, means for heating the chamber, including a heating device, and an exit-pipe connecting said chamber with the heating device, whereby, owing to the draft caused hy such heating device, a positive circulation of air within the incubator or brooder is produced, substantially 'in the manner described.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jones v. Cyphers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.