Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

115 F.2d 625

Docket No. 4734.

Sprinkle v. Davis

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1941-01-06

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently May 1942

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sprinkle v. Davis · Sprinkle v. Davis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1941-01-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1M. F. Trader, of Lynchburg, Va., and S. S. Lambeth, Jr., of Bedford City, Va., for appellant.

¶2Philip H. Hickson, of Lynchburg, Va. (DuVal Radford, II, and Landon Lowry, both of Bedford City, Va., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before PARKER, SOPER, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is the third appeal by the defendant in this case. On the two prior appeals 104 F.2d 487, and 111 F.2d 925, 128 A.L.R. 1101, he complained of the refusal of the District Court to direct a verdict in his favor and of divers other rulings. On account of the other rulings the judgment was each time reversed, but on each occasion 'we held that there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury.

¶6The evidence on the third trial leads to the same conclusion, and the judgment is therefore affirmed.

/115/f2d/625 · .json · Public domain