Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 F.3d 100 - Gioioso Sons Inc v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission a

Gioioso Sons Inc v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission a’s Empirical Analysis

115 F.3d 100 · 1997

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
3
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably Frazier v. Fairhaven School Committee (2002), Astralis Condominium Ass'n v. Secretary, United States Department of Housing & Urban Development ex rel. García-Guillén (2010)

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

230199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Udall v. Tallman · Weinberger v. Salfi · Russello v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he findings of the Commission with respect to questions of fact, if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, shall be conclusive.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “forces parties to take administrative proceedings seriously, allows administrative agencies an opportunity to correct their own errors, and potentially avoids the need for judicial involvement altogether.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “violated the same standard on an earlier occasion in a substantially similar fashion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.