Farley v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.’s Empirical Analysis
115 F.3d 1548 · 1997
Citation profile
25 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Miller v. Kenworth of Dothan, Inc. (2002), Webb v. Cardiothoracic Surgery Associates of North Texas, P.A. (1998)
25 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Pullman-Standard v. Swint · Henson v. City of Dundee
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“when the employer has adopted an anti-discrimination policy that is comprehensive, well-known to employees, vigorously enforced, and provides alternate avenues of redress.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he employee’s reaction to harassment complained of affect[s] tangible aspects of the employee’s compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment. The acceptance or rejection of the harassment by an employee must be an express or implied condition to the receipt of a job benefit or the cause of a tangible job detriment in order to create liability under this theory of sexual harassment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Where there is evidence from which a jury reasonably could infer that the employer did know of the harassment, of course, the existence of a policy — no matter how well-designed — will not absolve an employer of liability under Title VII.”). 10 . There is also some evidence in the record that Plaintiff Denson was”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.