Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 F.3d 276 - Tucker v. Johnson

Tucker v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

115 F.3d 276 · 1997

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
July 2011
most recently cited

13 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably Trevino v. Johnson (1999), Emery v. Johnson (1997)

13 federal appellate ·

150199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Murray v. Carrier · Lindh v. Murphy · Penry v. Lynaugh · Barefoot v. Estelle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Unlike Eenry’s mental retardation and childhood abuse, 'voluntary intoxication is not the kind of uniquely severe permanent handicapO with which the defendant was burdened through no fault of his own that requires a special instruction to ensure that the mitigating effect of such evidence finds expression in the jury’s sentencing decision.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[S]elf-inflicted chronic drug and alcohol abuse and the resulting arrested emotional development do not constitute a unique handicap ‘with which the defendant was burdened through no fault of his own.' ”). 3 . The first special issue reads as follows;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'do[ ] not conflict with Lindh 's conclusion that the chapter 153 amendments do not apply retroactively.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.