Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 F.3d 657 - Williams v. Babbitt

Williams v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis

115 F.3d 657 · 1997

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
1
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently August 2020 · most notably Artichoke Joe's California Grand Casino v. Norton (2003), United States v. Deaton (2003)

46 federal appellate · 5 district · 4 state decisions

5101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 4702 · 16 U.S.C. § 1153 · 16 U.S.C. § 1371 (§ 101 of the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972) · 16 U.S.C. § 1531 (§ 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1721 · 16 U.S.C. § 3111 · 16 U.S.C. § 668A · 16 U.S.C. § 712

Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Roe v. Wade · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · William Marbury v. James Madison · Morton v. Mancari

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “just as we will not infer from an ambiguous statute that Congress meant to encroach on constitutional boundaries, we will not presume from ambiguous language that Congress intended to authorize an agency to do so”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e seriously doubt that Congress could give Indians a complete monopoly on the casino industry or on Space Shuttle contracts.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “a blanket exemption for Indians from all civil service examinations”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.