Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 F.3d 818 - Smith v. Roberts

Smith v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

115 F.3d 818 · 1997

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
2
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably Moore v. Reynolds (1998), Douglas v. Workman (2009)

13 federal appellate · 6 district · 2 state decisions

1101997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Pennsylvania v. Ritchie · Sanders v. Sullivan · Fero v. Kerby

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceedings would have been different.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the prosecution suppressed the evidence, the evidence would have been favorable to [them], and the suppressed evidence was material.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.