Hastie v. Jc Penney Life Insurance Company’s Empirical Analysis
115 F.3d 895 · 1997
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 2019
1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Harris v. Carolina Life Insurance Company · Southern Solvents Incorporated v. New Hampshire Insurance Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to demand a causal connection between the intoxication and the injury. Id. at , 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS, at . Under Hartford's interpretation, an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“directly or indirectly, wholly or partially from ... bodily injury while under the influence of aleohol”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“caused by or resulting from ... an injury occurring while the covered person is intoxicated”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.