Kahn v. Smith Barney Shearson Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
115 F.3d 930 · 1997
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2020
9 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 9
Relies on First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Volt Information Sciences Inc v. Board of Trustees of Leland Stanford Junior University · St. Laurent v. Ambrose · Moccio v. New York State Office of Court Administration · Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co. v. Luckie
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“preclusive effect to a state court judgment to the same extent as would courts of the state in which the judgment was entered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.