¶1 Shirley Thibodeaux appeals her sentence imposed on a guilty-plea conviction for fraud in connection with identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028(a)(7), (b)(1)(D), (c)(3)(A). Thibodeaux argues that the district court erred in imposing a 12-level adjustment because the loss attributed to Thibodeaux exceeded $200,000, a two-level adjustment because the offense involved more than 10 but fewer than 50 victims, and a two-level adjustment because Thibodeaux used one means of identification to unlawfully obtain another means of identification. See U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(l)(G), (b)(2)(A), (b)(9)(C)(i)(Nov.2002).
¶2 For the first time on appeal, Thibodeaux argues that these sentencing adjustments were unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). As Thibodeaux concedes, her Blakely argument is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Pineiro, 377 F.3d 464, 473 (5th Cir.2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263). Accordingly, Thibodeaux’s sentence is AFFIRMED.