Strandell v. Jackson County’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (§ 101 of the Speedy Trial Act of 1974)
Relies on Kothe v. Smith · O'malley v. Chrysler Corp. · Ruiz v. Transportes Aereos Militares Ecuadorianos · 636 F. Supp. 1575 - United States v. Reaves · Lockhart v. Patel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he participants at any conference under this rule may consider and take action with respect to ... (7) the possibility of settlement or the use of extrajudicial procedures to resolve the dispute ... and ... (11) such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“to appear before it for a conference or conferences before trial for such purposes as (1) expediting the disposition of the action ... and ... (5) facilitating the settlement of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“ability of a court to use its best judgment to move its crowded docket must be preserved, where it involves a non-binding yet highly successful procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.