Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 FRD 59 - Quick Container Services, Inc. v. Interpool Ltd.

Quick Container Services, Inc. v. Interpool Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2018

2 state decisions

301987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. Peyser · Federman v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance · Harris v. Steinem · United States v. Aquavella · National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. A. L. Fowler, D. O. Thomas, and E. O. Thomas, Individually and Doing Business as Fowler Poultry & Egg Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where one party brings an initial suit for breach of contract, such as Interpool's Houston action, an adverse party may not file a subsequent action based on the same contract, unless this action was pleaded as a counterclaim in the initial suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.