Porter v. Snyder’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2017
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Chandra v. Sprinkle
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]y its plain meaning, this does not include incident reports which are not reports of the review committee, but rather are contemporaneous statements of facts relating to incidents which are reviewed by the committee.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`knowledge that a health care provider has committed an act which is or may be below the applicable standard of care or which may be grounds for disciplinary action'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“`refer the report to the appropriate executive committee or professional practices peer committee.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.