115 F. Supp. 2d 1322 - Mitchell v. Geico’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 28 U.S.C. § 1447
Relies on St Paul Mercury Indemnity Co v. Red Cab Co · Zahn v. International Paper Co. · Snyder v. Harris · Burns v. Windsor Insurance · Cohen v. Office Depot, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“primarily concerned with retrospective monetary relief for each class member, not prospective injunctive relief for the class as a whole”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.