Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

115 Ga. 23

Jarriel v. Jarriel

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 26, 1902

Supreme Court of Georgia · decided 1902-03-26

Relies on Adgate v. Central of Georgia Railway Co. · Gilbert Elliott Law Co. v. Tallapoosa Water Co. · Robson v. Cofield

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1902-03-26

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently May 1982 · most notably 12 Ga. App. 615 - Griffin v. State (1913), Alexander v. Chipstead (1922)

57 state decisions

130190219101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Cobb, J.

¶1Where in a certificate to a bill of exceptions the judge certifies that the bill of exceptions “ as amended.” is true, and the amendment referred to consists of a note by the judge which precedes the certificate and which shows that the bill of exceptions is in part not true, the writ of error must be dismissed. While the judge may supply omissions in a bill of exceptions by interlineations ornotes, any interlineation or note which has the effect of showing that some of the averments in the bill of exceptions are not true will work a dismissal of the writ of error, when the bill of exceptions is certified to be true only “as amended.” Fort v. Sheffield, 108 Ga. 781, and cases cited; Sanges v. State, 110 Ga. 260. See also Johnson v. Equitable Security Company, 113 Ga. 1153, and cases cited.

¶2Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little and Lewis, JJ., absent.
/115/ga/23 · .json · Public domain