Beasley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2011
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fallon v. State · Harris v. State · Carroll v. Crawford · Baldwin v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) that the witness is absent[;] (2) that he has been subpoenaed[;] (3) that he does not reside more than 100 miles from the place of trial...[;] (4) that his testimony is material^] (5) that the witness is not absent by permission ... of the movant[;] (6) that [the] movant expects to be able to procure the testimony of the witness at the next term of court[;] (7) that the continuance is not requested for purposes of delay . . . and, (8) the facts expected to be proved by the absent witness must be stated. 3”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.