Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

115 Idaho 208

766 P.2d 678

State v. Beam

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1988

Idaho Supreme Court · decided 1988-12-30

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-12-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co. (1990), State v. Card (1991)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 39 state decisions

24019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1DISSENT ON DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REHEARING

BISTLINE, Justice,

¶2dissenting on denial of petition for rehearing.

¶3On the direct appeal the Court’s opinion made a specific holding:

We hold that the sentence of death imposed in the instant case is not excessive or disproportionate to the penalty imposed in similar cases.

¶4That assessment when made was sound, and it is still sound. No one can say other than that I have agreed with it. But, as pointed out in the brief supporting the petition for rehearing, proportionality has yet to be considered by the Court with respect to the life sentence which codefendant Scroggins received.

¶5The trial judge, the Hon. Edward Lodge, now retired from the Bench, has made public his assessment that Beam was the less culpable of the two. Law enforcement officials shared that assessment. After a thorough perusal of the record in both cases, that also became my assessment.

¶6I remain of the opinion that it is legally unsound for the Court to not reconsider Beam’s sentence in light of, at least, the views of the trial judge and the officers that Beam was less culpable than Scrog-gins.

/115/idaho/208 · .json · Public domain