Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 Idaho 537 - Wiseman v. Schaffer

Wiseman v. Schaffer’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Viehweg v. Thompson · Klam v. Koppel · Schlieff v. Bistline · Gissel v. State · Sanders v. Ayrhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Conversion is any distinct act of dominion wrongfully exerted over another’s personal property in denial or inconsistent with his rights therein, such as a tortious taking of another’s chattels, or any wrongful exercise or assumption of authority, personally or by procurement, over another’s goods, depriving him of the possession, permanently or for an indefinite time. The act must be essentially tortious, but it is not essential to conversion sufficient to support the action of trover that the defendant should have complete manucaption of the property, or that he apply the property to his own use, if he has exercised dominion over it, in exclusion of, in defiance of, or inconsistent with the owner’s right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.