115 Ill. App. 3d 913 - Bryce v. Johnson & Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2000 · most notably 126 Ill. App. 3d 157 - Heying v. Simonaitis (1984), 204 Ill. App. 3d 302 - Marin v. American Meat Packing Co. (1990)
4 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 74 Ill. 2d 172 - Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc. · 85 Ill. 2d 124 - Palmateer v. International Harvester Co. · 81 Ill. 2d 571 - People v. Rogers · 92 Ill. 2d 545 - People v. Weaver · Paul MULLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is immediately apparent that the record before us does not contain sufficient proof to establish defendant’s guilt of retaliatory discharge. To begin with, there was no discharge of this plaintiff.” 115 Ill. App. 3d 913, 921 , 450 N.E.2d 1235, 1240 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]aking this testimony at face value, it is not by any means equivalent to even the slightest violation of ... [the Act] concerning restraint or coercion against the employee in any manner for exercising his rights under the ... Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is [a] total absence of even the slightest interference by the defendant in the exercise by plaintiff of all his rights under the ... Act,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.