115 Ind. App. 253 - Daugherty v. Daugherty’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 1983 · most notably 119 Ind. App. 180 - Daugherty v. Daugherty (1949), 125 Ind. App. 63 - Noyer, Exr. v. Ecker (1954)
3 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Teegarden v. Lewis · Crawfordsville Trust Co. v. Ramsey · Wiley v. Gordon · 108 Ind. App. 485 - Deckard v. Kleindorfer · Rarick v. Ulmer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well established that, ‘Ordinarily, it is the ultimate facts and not the evidentiary facts that should be stated in a special finding. But notwithstanding the well-settled rule that ultimate facts only should be found and that mere evidentiary facts will be disregarded the courts have held that where the primary facts found lead to but one conclusion, or where the facts found are of such a character that they necessitate the inference of the ultimate facts, such ultimate facts will be inferred and treated as found.’ 2 Watson’s Works Practice, p. 235, § 1593.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.