115 Ind. App. 73 - Ashman v. Studebaker’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
April 1958
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Parkison v. Thompson · Ray v. Baker · First National Bank v. Sarlls · Smith v. Pedigo · Hudelson v. Hudelson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In cases of purely equitable cognizance the statute, § 2-3229 Burns' 1933 . . . permits an assignment of error that the judgment is clearly against the weight of the evidence and thereby requires courts of error to `carefully consider and weigh the evidence,' but the above cases and many others hold that this statute has no application to conflicting oral testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bitner v. Bitner“This is the rule even when the evidence is documentary if the force and effect thereof depends in part on oral testimony.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bitner v. Bitner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.