Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 Kan. 116 - Wing v. Mollett

Wing v. Mollett’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2006
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2006

12 state decisions

50192419301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. Decker · King v. Stephens · Hampe v. Sage · Ross v. Allen · Hartshorn v. Smart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““While the form of the memorandum is not material, it must state the contract with reasonable certainty, so that the substance can be made to appear and be understood from the writing itself, or by direct reference to some extrinsic instrument or writing, without having recourse to parol proof.” (Syl. If 2.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.