Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 KAN 701 - Hickman v. Cave

Hickman v. Cave’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1986
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently February 1986

6 state decisions

201924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Atkinson v. Darling · Harris v. Morrison · Linn County Bank v. Grisham · Cox v. Beard · Huber Manufacturing Co. v. Claudel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The equitable remedy of reformation is not limited to cases of mutual mistakes. Where mistake unmixed with fraud is the basis of the relief sought it must be a mistake common to both parties, but the remedy is available where, by the mistake of one party induced by the fraud of another, there is omitted from a deed land which it was stipulated should be conveyed and which the first party was led to believe was covered by the description written in the instrument.” (Syl.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.