Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 KAN 862 - Flick v. Murdock

Flick v. Murdock’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently November 1982

2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

201924193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Railroad Co. · Erwin v. United States · Traer v. Clews · Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Terry · Warner v. Flack

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Modem authorities make the distinction between the sale of an interest to which a right to sue is incident and the sale of a mere right to sue. The former is good; the latter is not.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.