Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 Md. 195 - Hogan v. McMahon

Hogan v. McMahon’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
5
states following
March 1994
most recently cited

60 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 1994 · most notably Crawford v. Crawford (1982), Meyers v. East End Loan & Savings Ass'n (1922)

60 state decisions

160191119201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hanover Fire Insurance v. Alexander Brown & Sons · Israel v. Israel · Parsons v. Urie · McLaughlin v. Barnum · Worthington v. Hiss

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Where a mortgage is discharged on payment made by one of the joint mortgagors, or his successors in interest, it may be treated in equity as still subsisting for the protection of the party making payment, or the delinquent’s share in the mortgaged premises may be regarded as subject to a lien for the amount paid on the mortgage for his benefit.’ ” (Emphasis added). Hogan v. McMahon, 115 Md. at 203 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““ ‘Where a tenant in common discharges a mortgage upon the joint property, equity treats him as an assignee of the mortgage as against his co-tenants interest in the property, and this though no actual assignment is made.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.