Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 Mich. App. 533 - People v. Perry

115 Mich. App. 533 - People v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a strong argument could be made that defense counsel waived re-recording by the court reporter of the preliminary examination testimony since the parties obviously had to be aware that the court reporter was not recording the preliminary examination testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[D]efendant's contention that a determination cannot be made from the trial transcript as to which portions of the preliminary examination testimony was read at trial is without merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the better practice may have been to re-transcribe the preliminary examination testimony as it was read at the trial,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.