Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

115 Minn. 153

State v. Olson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 7, 1911

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1911-07-07

John Olson was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis of disorderly conduct and sentenced to hard labor in the workhouse for a term not exceeding thirty days. Erom an order, Leary, J., denying defendant’s motion for a new trial and to vacate and modify the judgment, he appealed.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Affirmed · Decided 1911-07-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 1968

20 state decisions

70191119201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Lewis, J.

¶1(dissenting).

¶2I dissent, for the reasons stated in the opinion in State v. Swanson. As there decided, this complaint consists of mere conclusions. The defendants made a noise in the city of Minneapolis, or got up a riot, or in some way created an improper diversion. How; when; where; under what circumstances ? Nothing is stated to put the defendants in possession of the facts necessary to prepare for their defense.

¶3There is no sound distinction between a formal complaint and *157«one entered on the record by the clerk. When entered by the clerk, the facts constituting the offense may be more briefly stated; but the essential facts must be set out, or no offense is charged.

/115/minn/153 · .json · Public domain