115 N.C. App. 209 - Dublin v. UCR, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably 165 N.C. App. 1 - Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. (2004), Frost v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc. (2000)
24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Calloway v. Ford Motor Company · Crow v. Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc. · Zenith Laboratories, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc. · 49 N.C. App. 631 - Carr v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no appeal lies from one superior court judge to another; that one superior court judge may not correct another's errors of law; and that ordinarily one judge may not modify, overrule, or change the judgment of another superior court judge previously made in the same action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The order entered by Judge [Morgan] was interlocutory.... Thus, a subsequent judge could modify the order for circumstances which changed the legal foundation for the prior order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“However, in an appropriate context a superior court judge has the power to modify an interlocutory order entered by another....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.