115 N.C. App. 372 - Crossman v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schiavone v. Fortune · In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penalty · 96 N.C. App. 277 - Ring Drug Co. v. Carolina Medicorp Enterprises, Inc. · 82 N.C. App. 350 - Stevens v. Nimocks · Stevens v. Nimocks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“1) [T]he basic claim arises out of the conduct set forth in the original pleading, 2) the party to be brought in receives such notice that it will not be prejudiced in maintaining its defense, 3) the party knows or should have known that, but for a mistake concerning identity, the action would have been brought against it, and 4) the second and third requirements are fulfilled within the prescribed limitations period.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.