Bosteder v. Duling’s Empirical Analysis
1927
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 1996
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Koehn v. City of Hastings · Schweppe v. Uhl · Fitch v. Martin · Carson v. Hunt · Poos v. Fred Krug Brewing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A defendant in a criminal prosecution becoming a witness in his own behalf may be asked on cross-examination whether he has1 previously been convicted of a felony, and if he answers in the affirmative further examination along that line should cease.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sulley v. State“Civil death, as known to the common law, is without place in our jurisprudence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Stumes v. Bloomberg
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.