Manley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 24 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently February 2026 · most notably 47 Cal. 4th 745 - People v. Ervine (2009), Hernandez v. State (2002)
2 district · 24 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Barker v. Wingo · Gideon v. Wainwright · Arizona v. Fulminante
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where a client voluntarily reveals portions of the communications with the attorney, those revelations amount to a waiver of the attorney-client privilege as to the remainder of 2We have also reviewed Clark's arguments about Juror 2, and conclude that they are meritless and do not warrant reversal. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 10) I 947A the conversation or communication about the same subject matter.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“However, for waiver to occur, the witness's answers must be wide enough in scope and deep enough in substance to constitute a significant part of the communication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“may. . . be quantitatively assessed in the context of other evidence presented in order to determine whether [they were] harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Patterson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.