Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 Nev. 333 - Standley v. Warden

Standley v. Warden’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · United States v. Bruce · Miles v. Dorsey · Bryant v. State · Franklin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant had good reason to fear offending the judge if he declined [the plea offer] because the same judge would have presided over the trial and, if the trial resulted in a conviction, the judge would have determined the appropriate sentence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “judicial involvement in plea negotiations inevitably carries with it the high and unacceptable risk of coercing a defendant to accept the proposed agreement and plead guilty.... Among other things, `it might lead the defendant to believe that he would not receive a fair trial, were there a trial before the same judge.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.