Barajas v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Fruchtman v. Kenton · Downs-Morgan v. United States · United States v. Banda · Bryant v. State · United States v. Romero-Vilca
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not fall below an objective standard of reasonableness and, thus, does not rise to the level of ineffective assistance of counsel”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. D'AMBROSIO v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.