Libby v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2021
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hernandez v. New York · Powers v. Ohio · Purkett v. Elem · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have directed Nevada's district courts to 'clearly spell out the three-step analysis' when deciding Batson-type issues.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Witless a SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA OD 1947A e. 8 discriminatory intent is inherent in the prosecutor's explanation, the reason offered will be deemed race-neutral”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Conner v. State“A district court's decision to admit or exclude evidence rests within its sound discretion and will not be disturbed unless it is manifestly 17 wrong.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.