115 N.J. Eq. 84 - Datz v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently April 1982
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Penrose v. Absecon Land Co. · Holland Reform School Society v. DeLazier · Andrews v. Stelle · 102 N.J. Eq. 535 - Martin v. Morales · Holland Reformed School Society v. DeLazier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the hearing is limited to the submission of ex parte affidavits, the manifestation in the affidavits of bona fides and of a supporting background of fact must sometimes, in order to guard against injustice, be deemed sufficient to carry the defense over to a time when the testimony shall be orally given and the rights of subpoena and of cross-examination may be exercised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Scarano v. Scarano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.