State v. Pennington’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
46 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably Mitchell-Carr v. McLendon (1999), Los Angeles County Department of Children & Family Services v. Shadonna C. (2008)
46 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Young · Gilbert v. First National Bank of Jackson · Starnes v. United States · 111 S. Ct. 425 - Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Ben Cooper, Inc. · In re Golub
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“by pointing to the evidence supporting the witness's credibility”). The prosecutor did that here by pointing to Detective Wilson’s demeanor on the stand and Detective Carrington’s corroborating testimony. 7 . The Arizona Supreme Court went on to hold that, although defense counsel’s comment was improper, it was not sufficiently provocative to invite the prosecutor's response in closing that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the entire staff ordinarily need not be disqualified from prosecuting the defendant if the staff member who had previously worked for the defendant is isolated from any participation in the prosecution of the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McClellan“[W]hen the disqualified attorney is effectively screened from any participation in the prosecution of the defendant, the prosecutor's office may, in general, proceed with the prosecution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. McClellan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.