Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 N.M. 41 - Narney v. Daniels

Narney v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

14 district · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Weinstein v. City of Santa Fe Ex Rel. Santa Fe Police Department (1996), Madrid v. Lincoln County Medical Center (1996)

14 district · 30 state decisions

180199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Calkins v. Cox Estates · Bober v. New Mexico State Fair · McCauley v. Ray · Franco v. Federal Building Service, Inc. · Marchiondo v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An employee’s action, although unauthorized, is considered to be in the scope of employment if the action (1) is the kind the employee is employed to perform; (2) occurs during a period reasonably connected to the authorized employment period; (3) occurs in an area reasonably close to the authorized area; and (4) is actuated, at least in part, by a purpose to serve the employer.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “1. It was something fairly and naturally incidental to the employer’s business assigned to the employee, and 2. It was done while the employee was engaged in the employer’s business with the view of furthering the employer’s interest and did not arise entirely from some external, independent and personal motive on the part of the employee.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[g]enerally, whether an employee is acting in the course and scope of employment is a question of fact,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.