115 Ohio App. 3d 313 - State v. Knox’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2021
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 101 Ohio App. 3d 428 - State v. Polick · 78 Ohio App. 3d 784 - State v. Powell · 105 Ohio App. 3d 471 - State v. Williams · 91 Ohio App. 3d 301 - State v. Lefever · 104 Ohio App. 3d 785 - State v. Pendleton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“* * * If an offender alleges in an affidavit filed with the court prior to sentencing that the offender is indigent and unable to pay the mandatory fine and if the court determines the offender is an indigent person and is unable to pay the mandatory fine described in this division the court shall not impose the mandatory fine imposed upon the offender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The fact that no affidavit of indigency was filed * * * is sufficient, alone, to find that the trial court did not err by imposing the mandatory fine.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.