115 Ohio App. 3d 567 - In Re Beechler’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently August 2025 · most notably 128 Ohio App. 3d 498 - In Re Onion (1998), 181 Ohio App. 3d 606 - In Re B.M. (2009)
65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 101 Ohio App. 3d 245 - In Re Christopher R. · 57 Ohio St. 2d 31 - State v. Billups · 101 Ohio App. 3d 778 - In Re Flynn · 102 Ohio App. 3d 275 - In Re McKenzie · 101 Ohio App. 3d 177 - In Re Jenkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) The party understands that by entering an admission the party is waiving the right to challenge the witnesses and evidence against the party, to remain silent, and to introduce evidence at the adjudicatory hearing.”
18 later decisions quote this exact passage“Juv.R. 29 is analogous to Crim.R. 11 since both require a trial court to * * * ensure that the admission or guilty plea is entered voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re R.A.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.