115 Ohio App. 3d 688 - Davison v. Rini’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably Alexander v. Scheid (2000), 377 Ill. App. 3d 895 - Bauer Ex Rel. Bauer v. Memorial Hosp. (2007)
90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dresher v. Burt · Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co. · Mitseff v. Wheeler · Bostic v. Connor · Noble v. Colwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"`[T]he primary issue to be determined by this court in the case at bar is whether after construing the evidence most strongly in favor of the appellants, an inference may reasonably arise that the alleged negligence by appellee was, in probability, the direct and proximate cause of appellant's reduced life span. Stated differently, the issue is whether appellant adduced sufficient probative evidence from which it may be inferred that her medical prognosis probably would have been better were it not for the alleged negligence of the appellee.'"”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The court may enter final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay. In the absence of a determination that there is no just reason for delay, any order or other form of decision, however designated, which adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties, shall not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“This appeal followed. {¶ 6} Before we address the merits of the assignments of error, we must first resolve a threshold jurisdictional issue. Appellate courts have jurisdiction over final appealable orders. See Section 3 (B)( 2 ), Article IV , Ohio Constitution. If an order is not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.