115 Or. App. 609 - State v. Fish’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“advised [defendant] that he had the right to refuse the field sobriety test; that if he did refuse the test, that could be used against him as evidence in court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fish“shall be informed of the consequences of refusing to take or failing to submit to the tests under ORS 813.136.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fish
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.