Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 P3D 274 - State v. Hiett

State v. Hiett’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · State v. JP · Gibson v. County of Washoe · State v. J.P. · Schooley v. Pinch's Deli Market, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “if a causal connection exists between the crime as a whole and the property loss and damage.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the court shall require the respondent to make restitution to any persons who have suffered loss or damage as a result of the offense committed by the respondent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “but for the criminal acts of the defendant, the victim would not have suffered the damages for which restitution is sought”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.