State v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
246 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 247 later decisions — most recently December 2024 · most notably State v. Engel (2009), Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc. (2007)
246 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn · Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C. · 89 Wash. 2d 592 - Childers v. Childers · In the Matter of Charles · WPPA v. State, Dept. of Revenue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 247 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the context of the statute in which that provision is found, related provisions, and the statutory scheme as a whole.”
33 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1)(a) Except as provided in (b) or (c) of this subsection, whenever a person is to be sentenced for two or more current offenses, the sentence range for each current offense shall be determined by using all other current and prior convictions as if they were prior convictions for the purpose of the offender score: PROVIDED, That if the court enters a finding that some or all of the current offenses encompass the same criminal conduct then those current offenses shall be counted as one crime. Sentences imposed under this subsection shall be served concurrently. Consecutive sentences may only be imposed under the exceptional sentence provisions of RCW 9.94A.535. "Same criminal conduct," as used in this subsection, means two or more crimes that require the same criminal intent, are committed at the same time and place, and involve the same victim. This definition applies in cases involving vehicular assault or vehicular homicide even if the victims occupied the same vehicle. (b) [pertaining to scoring and imposition of sentence for serious violent offenses]. (c) [pertaining to scoring and imposition of sentence for crimes committed with a firearm]. (2)(a) Except as provided in (b) of this subsection, whenever a person while under sentence for conviction of a felony commits another felony and is sentenced to another term of confinement, the latter term shall not begin until expiration of all prior terms. (b) [pertaining to community supervision]. (3) Subject to subsections (1) a”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Elmore · State v. Mandanas“[W]here the Legislature uses certain statutory language in one instance, and different language in another, there is a difference of legislative intent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.